Illinois medical malpractice lawyers face extended trials steeped in endless expert testimony, caveats in civil program and generally hundreds of thousands of income at risk, all the result of emotionally heart wrenching cases involving deaths, amputations, paralysis, brain damage, and practically always, pain and suffering. Between the critical roles that attorneys play in medical malpractice cases, the role of proving pain and suffering is one of the most challenging.
Paralyzed in silence on an operating table, a 53-year-old patient was unable to react after he experienced anesthesia awareness during open heart surgery. He suffered the pain of a bone saw cutting through his sternum and jolts of excruciation as doctors shocked his heart. He listened in agony to conversations in between the surgical team that was totally oblivious of his anesthesia awareness. The patient was unable to move, scream or give any type of indication that he was in pain. Following surgery, the patient was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress syndrome. The patient hired a lawyer to raise pain and suffering as a bring about of action inside a medical malpractice case. Though there was no other trigger of action involved within the case, the patient was awarded $262,500.
Most Illinois lawyers know that as of 2001, pain and suffering is no longer just an element of damages, but a result in of action in medical malpractice. It's each medical professional's duty to treat and successfully control pain. Inferring that pain is all inside a patient's head is no longer a valid defense.
Pain and suffering cannot be seen or heard and usually, there is no physical evidence to prove its existence. Illinois lawyers are named upon to prove the invisible, working against hundreds of years of social and cultural ideologies, to show the 12 member juries what's silently tormenting their clients.
To make matters far more tough for medical malpractice lawyers, medical professionals generally disregard pain and suffering. To be able to treat severely injured patients effectively, numerous in the most effective doctors do not enable themselves to empathize. Being a result, pain and suffering is often a symptom that is easily ignored.
In addition to medical professionals, juries can be unwilling to empathize with patients who raise pain and suffering as a cause of action for medical malpractice. Illinois medical malpractice lawyers must work against strong political beliefs and viewpoints of jurors. Republican-minded jurors tend to become much less sympathetic using a patient's pain and suffering and much more cognizant from the require for tort reform. There's a powerful ideology that patients need to be able to deal with pain and not open the floodgates of new litigation to the judicial system. As opposed to other causes of action, just like severe burns, quadriplegia, and mutilation, pain and suffering is invisible and impossible to objectively quantify, so it is all as well often disregarded.
When jurors have blind faith in both the medical community and politicians, it is tough for Illinois medical malpractice lawyers to garner sympathy for patients who have no scars or physical proof of pain and suffering. Thus, plaintiffs who endure undue pain and suffering that breaches the standards of care, have a lead to of action for medical malpractice, but nonetheless face the challenge of presenting a situation which could break through the social and political ideologies of jurors.
The July 2006 edition in the Economist reported that understanding pain and suffering is 1 of leading neurological difficulties of our time. The old saying "it's all in his/her head" isn't too far off base, as pain and suffering definitely is regulated by nerves during the brain. Unfortunately, the human brain is 1 on the least understood areas of medical science, and several patients continue to endure it. As long as pain is silently endured, Illinois medical malpractice lawyers face the challenge of proving that it exists.
Paralyzed in silence on an operating table, a 53-year-old patient was unable to react after he experienced anesthesia awareness during open heart surgery. He suffered the pain of a bone saw cutting through his sternum and jolts of excruciation as doctors shocked his heart. He listened in agony to conversations in between the surgical team that was totally oblivious of his anesthesia awareness. The patient was unable to move, scream or give any type of indication that he was in pain. Following surgery, the patient was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress syndrome. The patient hired a lawyer to raise pain and suffering as a bring about of action inside a medical malpractice case. Though there was no other trigger of action involved within the case, the patient was awarded $262,500.
Most Illinois lawyers know that as of 2001, pain and suffering is no longer just an element of damages, but a result in of action in medical malpractice. It's each medical professional's duty to treat and successfully control pain. Inferring that pain is all inside a patient's head is no longer a valid defense.
Pain and suffering cannot be seen or heard and usually, there is no physical evidence to prove its existence. Illinois lawyers are named upon to prove the invisible, working against hundreds of years of social and cultural ideologies, to show the 12 member juries what's silently tormenting their clients.
To make matters far more tough for medical malpractice lawyers, medical professionals generally disregard pain and suffering. To be able to treat severely injured patients effectively, numerous in the most effective doctors do not enable themselves to empathize. Being a result, pain and suffering is often a symptom that is easily ignored.
In addition to medical professionals, juries can be unwilling to empathize with patients who raise pain and suffering as a cause of action for medical malpractice. Illinois medical malpractice lawyers must work against strong political beliefs and viewpoints of jurors. Republican-minded jurors tend to become much less sympathetic using a patient's pain and suffering and much more cognizant from the require for tort reform. There's a powerful ideology that patients need to be able to deal with pain and not open the floodgates of new litigation to the judicial system. As opposed to other causes of action, just like severe burns, quadriplegia, and mutilation, pain and suffering is invisible and impossible to objectively quantify, so it is all as well often disregarded.
When jurors have blind faith in both the medical community and politicians, it is tough for Illinois medical malpractice lawyers to garner sympathy for patients who have no scars or physical proof of pain and suffering. Thus, plaintiffs who endure undue pain and suffering that breaches the standards of care, have a lead to of action for medical malpractice, but nonetheless face the challenge of presenting a situation which could break through the social and political ideologies of jurors.
The July 2006 edition in the Economist reported that understanding pain and suffering is 1 of leading neurological difficulties of our time. The old saying "it's all in his/her head" isn't too far off base, as pain and suffering definitely is regulated by nerves during the brain. Unfortunately, the human brain is 1 on the least understood areas of medical science, and several patients continue to endure it. As long as pain is silently endured, Illinois medical malpractice lawyers face the challenge of proving that it exists.
About the Author:
Illinois Medical Malpractice Lawyers Take in on a Challenge of Proving Pain and Suffering - Check Out illinois lawyers and injury lawyer
No comments:
Post a Comment